By Carl Delfeld of Chartwell ETF
While the Congress party led coalition strong
showing is heartening, it does not in my view signal a dramatic change in
economic and market prospects.
First, India’s market had already made a nice run
in 2009 and valuations relative to other markets are not compelling. The SENSEX
index now trades a t a hefty premium to other emerging markets and has rallied
75% from its recent low in just over two months.
Second, these gains and valuations are against a
backdrop of a weakening economy and financial shortfalls with economic growth
rates estimated to fall from 9% to less than 5% according to some analysts. The
first budget, due in July, will puncture any sense that financial pressures
will lessen going forward.
Third, and most importantly, the impact of the
election on the key market reforms needed to significantly improve India’s
economy are at best minimal due to the nature of the election. I do believe
that great bull markets are often ignited by elections based on significant
mandates for growth-oriented change. But this election was about personality,
the extreme positions of the opposition and business as usual.
The continued premiership of Manmohan Singh, 76,
is a source of stability and serenity when what India really needs is sustained
and substantial reform. Does the election make this more probable? To
answer this we need to look underneath the recent campaign to examine the
source of the Congress party electoral gains.
Much credit needs to be given to the efforts of
Rahul Gandhi, 39, the son, grandson and great-grandson of Indian prime
ministers. He vigorously and to great effect campaigned in areas where the
party has traditionally been weak. But what was his message? With barely
a nod to the importance of growth and need for market reforms, it was the usual
bromides on social justice and the need to protect India from the pitfalls of
global capitalism.
In fact, while it was common to hear over the
last five years that reform was being stymied by the leftist wing of the ruling
United Progressive Alliance, it was the Nehru-Gandhi power base led by Sonia
Gandhi who opposed many market reforms and bragged about nationalizing the
banks.
It doesn’t seem to me that there is any new
mandate for positive change despite a situation that cries out for more
competition, private financing of infrastructure such as power, streamlining
bureaucracy, fighting corruption, vastly improving primary education and making
labor markets more flexible.




